Pharmacovigilance is the science and practice of monitoring the safety of medicines and vaccines and taking action to reduce risks and increase benefits. The following components are needed for any national pharmacovigilance system:
A national pharmacovigilance center with designated staff (at least one full time), stable basic funding, clear mandates, well defined structures and roles, and collaborating with the WHO Programme for International Drug Monitoring.
The existence of a national spontaneous reporting system with a national individual case safety report (ICSR) form i.e. an adverse drug report form.
A national database or system for collating and managing ADRs.
A national ADR or pharmacovigilance advisory committee able to provide technical assistance on causality assessment, risk assessment, risk management, case investigation and, where necessary, crisis management including crisis communication.
A clear communication strategy for routine and crisis communication.
The WHO Global Benchmarking Tool provides a framework for assessment of country pharmacovigilance readiness, as seen in Table 1.
Table 1: WHO Framework for Assessment of Pharmacovigilance Readiness
Indicators | Level 3 Sub-indicators |
VL01 Legal provisions, regulations and guidelines required to define regulatory framework of vigilance | VL01.05: Legal provisions, regulations and guidelines require manufacturers and/or MAHs to designate an individual person to be in charge of vigilance system VL01.06: There are guidelines for planning, conducting, monitoring, and reporting |
VL02 Arrangement for effective organization and good governance | VL02.02: Documented procedures and mechanisms are implemented to ensure the involvement, coordination and communication among all stakeholders relevant to vigilance activities |
VL03 Human resources to perform vigilance activities | VL03.01: Sufficient competent staff (i.e., education, training, skills and experience) are assigned to perform vigilance activities VL03.02: Duties, functions, and responsibilities of the staff in charge of vigilance activities are established and updated in the respective job descriptions VL03.03: Training plan developed, implemented and updated at least once a year for staff in charge of vigilance activities VL03.04: The NRA generates and maintains records of staff training activities and training effectiveness verification |
VL04 Procedures established and implemented to perform vigilance activities | VL04.01: Vigilance procedures and tools are in place and implemented for collection and assessment of ADRs and AEs VL04.02: Vigilance procedures and tools are in place for investigation, interpretation of and response to ADRs and AEs VL04.04: Risk approach is considered throughout different vigilance activities, including timely response to detected signals for risks or benefit VL04.06: The NRA has access to expert committees for review of serious emergent safety concerns, when needed |
VL05 Mechanism in place to monitor regulatory performance and output | VL05.01: Vigilance information is used in timely manner to amend existing regulatory decisions or to issue new regulatory decisions or actions |
VL06 Mechanism exists to promote transparency, accountability and communication | VL06.02: Mechanism for regular feedback to all stakeholders on vigilance events exists and is complemented with a risk communication plan VL06.03: Vigilance data and findings are shared with relevant regional and international partners |
Good Pharmacovigilance Practice (GPvP) is defined as a set of guidelines drawn up based on national legislations and regulations to ensure that all medicinal products including vaccines are monitored safely and securely throughout their life cycle. GPvP guidelines provide assurance of the continuous positive benefit-risk profile of medicinal products through
The ongoing collection, processing and reporting of safety data,
Continuous signal detection and risk management activities,
Proactive and timely communication of safety relevant information to all stakeholders including patients, healthcare professionals and the general public, and
Quality management of pharmacovigilance procedures.
It is expected that the following core GPvP requirements be met:
Description of the pharmacovigilance system, a Pharmacovigilance System Master File (PSMF)
Required procedures on core activities:
Collection of safety information (e.g., individual case safety reports ICSRs, literature reports)
Processing and analysis of the safety information (individual cases and aggregate safety data review)
Individual and aggregate reporting: Regulatory reporting of ICSRs, compiling and regulatory reporting of aggregate reports (i.e. DSURs, PSURs)
Signal detection, validation, and evaluation
Risk management and risk minimization
Benefit-risk assessment
Proactive and timely communication of safety relevant information
Quality management of pharmacovigilance procedures.
Safety Data Monitoring is important for any vaccine, but it is even more critical in a Public Health Emergency during which vaccines may be implemented on a large scale quickly in the absence of randomized, controlled efficacy data. Phase 1 clinical trials to evaluate vaccine safety are typically performed on a small number of subjects and may not detect rare adverse events that could be experienced once a vaccine is used in a much larger population. Pharmacovigilance systems in each country should be interconnected to allow for sharing of data and information across countries to aid in development of outbreak responses.
Good pharmacovigilance practices | European Medicines Agency (europa.eu)